Should You Hire an M&A Advisor or Go It Alone When Selling a Business?

Farkhad Hasanov
/
March 3, 2024
/
6 mins

At F2H, we bring white-glove advisory to secondaries, capital raising, and M&A under $150m – delivering the sophistication of top-tier investment banking to small GPs, LPs, and companies. Whether you’re exploring a full sale, strategic partnership, or liquidity solution, our team delivers expertise and execution every step of the way. Contact us today to start the conversation.

Introduction

When selling or merging a lower-middle-market company (say EBITDA $1–10 million, revenues $10–100 million), owners and sponsors often face a dilemma: do the process themselves (with internal counsel, accounting, and selective advisors) or hire an investment bank / M&A advisor? This article walks through pros, cons, decision criteria, and practical guidance.

What “going it alone” really means (and when it might make sense)

  • You retain full control of buyer selection, process pacing, and communications.
  • You avoid paying a dedicated sell-side fee or retainer to an advisor.
  • But “alone” still usually means engaging legal, accounting, tax, and possibly boutique advisory help.
  • It makes sense if the deal is relatively simple, your network is strong, and you have internal deal experience (or prior transaction experience).
  • However, many founders and owners underestimate the time, complexity, and conflict management burden of a full sale process.

What an investment bank / M&A advisor brings

Buyer access and network

  • Deep relationships across strategics, private equity, family offices, and industry buyers.
  • Ability to run a competitive auction, driving up the valuation.
  • Credibility in front of buyers: buyers take processes run by banks more seriously.

Valuation discipline & positioning

  • They help craft the “story” of the business (growth trajectory, defensible moats, metrics).
  • They bring process discipline to avoid lowball offers, force aggressive diligence, and vet term sheets.

Deal execution and negotiation

  • Handling diligence demands, data room, confidentiality, coordination, buyer questions.
  • Negotiating complex deal terms: earnouts, escrows, reps & warranties, indemnities, tax, post-closing adjustments.
  • Managing closing mechanics, third-party consents, carveouts, working capital.

Time leverage & internal focus

  • You (management/owners) can stay focused on running the business.
  • The advisor becomes the buffer, legal traffic cop, negotiation engine.

Signaling and credibility

  • Hiring an advisor can signal to the market that you’re serious and that your expectations are realistic.
  • It helps manage perceived price discovery (i.e. “why would I sell cheap if I have a real advisor?”).

Empirical evidence suggests that sellers using advisors often achieve better outcomes in private M&A settings.

The costs, risks & downsides of hiring a bank / advisor

  • Fees: engagement retainer, success fees (often a percentage of enterprise value), sometimes minimums. At F2H, we do not charge a retainer.
  • Loss of control / process speed: the advisor may push for broad outreach or push toward the “market” pace that feels external.
  • Mismatch of incentives: some advisors may push volume rather than deal quality.
  • Selection risk: a weak or misaligned advisor can damage process, leak confidentiality, or fail to bring good buyers.
  • Overhead: you need to coordinate and manage your advisor, supply them data, and handle oversight.

When “go alone” might win

  • The target buyer is obvious and known (e.g. a related strategic or partner) and the path is straightforward.
  • The transaction is easy (low complexity, limited diligence).
  • Your organization or sponsor already has deep transaction experience and capacity to manage all the moving parts.
  • You’re comfortable negotiating, structuring, and project-managing.
  • You accept risk that valuation may suffer, process leaks may occur, or deal execution might slow.

Decision framework: when to hire and when not to

Factor Favors Hiring an Advisor Favors Going Alone
Deal complexity (multiple buyers, carveouts, earnouts, international) Strongly favors advisor Simple structure only
Network reach needed High (advisor brings buyers) You already have key access
Internal bandwidth & experience Low / limited High / prior deal experience
Willingness to pay advisory fees More leeway Very cost-sensitive
Need for auction / competitive tension Yes No (single buyer)
Confidentiality management risk High Low (you trust internal team)

In practice, for many lower-middle deals, hiring an experienced M&A advisor or boutique investment bank tends to offer net value for sellers.

Best practices if you hire an advisor

  • Select by specialization and track record: Look for advisors who have worked on deals your size, in your industry.
  • Ensure priority alignment: the deal should be a priority, not a “side job.”
  • Define clear deliverables and timeline in the engagement letter (who does what, when).
  • Cap retainer or fee clawbacks to ensure rigor.
  • Be transparent about internal constraints (you may veto certain buyers for cultural or confidentiality reasons).
  • Stay involved: don’t cede all control—review buyer lists, major term sheet options, key legal structure decisions.

Concluding recommendation & risk caveats

For most lower-middle-market M&A, hiring a good investment banking / M&A advisory partner is the safer and often higher-value route. The complexity, negotiation pressure, buyer outreach, and execution risk of even a modest deal often overwhelm independent teams. That said, “going it alone” is defensible when deal structure is simple, buyer known, and internal capacity high.

At F2H, we bring white-glove advisory to secondaries, capital raising, and M&A under $150m – delivering the sophistication of top-tier investment banking to small GPs, LPs, and companies. Whether you’re exploring a full sale, strategic partnership, or liquidity solution, our team delivers expertise and execution every step of the way. Contact us today to start the conversation.

Article content: